City of Grants Pass v. Johnson

In the City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld an Oregon city’s ordinance prohibiting unsheltered individuals from sleeping or establishing encampments in public spaces. The Court held that such ordinances do not contravene the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against cruel and unusual punishment, even in circumstances where available shelter beds are insufficient to accommodate the local homeless population.

Overview of the Decision

The ruling supports local governments’ authority to implement and enforce anti-sleeping and anti-camping ordinances, even where shelter space is limited. The Court emphasized the need for municipalities to manage public spaces while balancing humane treatment of homeless populations.

Impact on Prosecutors

This ruling is likely to have far-reaching implications for similar ordinances nationwide and could potentially reshape strategies for addressing homelessness at the municipal level. While initially imposing civil penalties, these ordinances can escalate to criminal sanctions, requiring prosecutors to navigate complex legal and ethical terrain.

There may be increased pressure from local governments to prosecute these cases to deter behavior seen as detrimental to public spaces and local businesses. Clear communication with the public about the rationale behind enforcement and the steps being taken to provide support and services to the homeless population will be essential.


Learn more about other recent Supreme Court decisions: Smith v. Arizona and United States v Rahimi

National District Attorneys Association
1400 Crystal Drive, Suite 330
Arlington, VA 22202

Contact Us